<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Blogging drive change ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drsavi.com/can-blogging-drive-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drsavi.com/can-blogging-drive-change/</link>
	<description>A guide to using New Media, ELearning, Social Networking and Effective Web Business Strategies</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr Savi</title>
		<link>http://www.drsavi.com/can-blogging-drive-change/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Savi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kh-2.com/DrSaviBus/2007/03/09/can-blogging-drive-change/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I assume by Traditional you mean, the current outlets of content from media empires. In addition, it may also be worth noting that content aggregation depends on what is being consolidated. For example, the orignal source of each feed. Or, in the case of regular print, what feeds are they reading before or should I say, if they are being filtered. Take for example, Reuters, they have a great feed that gets information from international sources. I assume that editors and journalists can get hold of this information and then make a decision to print or not print it. This is what I would call 'filtering'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume by Traditional you mean, the current outlets of content from media empires. In addition, it may also be worth noting that content aggregation depends on what is being consolidated. For example, the orignal source of each feed. Or, in the case of regular print, what feeds are they reading before or should I say, if they are being filtered. Take for example, Reuters, they have a great feed that gets information from international sources. I assume that editors and journalists can get hold of this information and then make a decision to print or not print it. This is what I would call &#8216;filtering&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hurst</title>
		<link>http://www.drsavi.com/can-blogging-drive-change/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kh-2.com/DrSaviBus/2007/03/09/can-blogging-drive-change/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>More and more is being made of the power of blogging.
Your point on political bloggers and their (traditional) positioning to 'control' what the public get access is interesting - You are probably not implying a conspiracy, instead a frustration that people are not being heard because of the various SEO, that's Search Engine Optimisation that may be blocking out true talent that exists in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More and more is being made of the power of blogging.<br />
Your point on political bloggers and their (traditional) positioning to &#8216;control&#8217; what the public get access is interesting - You are probably not implying a conspiracy, instead a frustration that people are not being heard because of the various SEO, that&#8217;s Search Engine Optimisation that may be blocking out true talent that exists in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
